He had claimed to be God equal with God, and they had tried on a number of occasions to stone HIm, just as Moses had said they should for a charge of blasphemyas long as two or three witnesses could testify. A piece here and a piece there but no even close to a complete speach. I like the KJV AND the ESV, NKJV and NASB, et al. Regards Codex Siniaticius. That is why the copying of Bible manuscripts was such a big business. But they as a group had heard Jesus Himself. 95% of all NT Manuscripts agree, yet modern scholars reject the testimony of the Received text underlying the KJV English translation in favor of something that was discarded asking us to believe that the True Words of God were lost for hundreds of years making God a liar in His Promise of Preservation. Theres also another question which IS academic but also glossed over: Ignorance is one thing and may be forgiven, but a careless approach or deliberate twisting is another. are parchment, or vellum, codices. I am still looking into this. A million is a million, not one less than a million. Undoubtedly! There were several English translations published long before the KJV; to wit, Coverdale bible (1535), Matthews bible, (1537) The Great bible, (1539) Geneva Bible, (1560) Bishops Bible, (1568), et al. if this is negative, then how is murder, rape, child abuse, greed classified? 4 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all long suffering and doctrine. Those manuscripts used as originals in this business wore out very quickly, those used in worship or sold on for private devotions lasted longer, but not for centuries unless unused. And for those who have sinned I was The sound foundation built by seeking knowledge and wisdom come from meditating on the word day and night and then is still a spiritual revelation of the truth of God. The only Greek manuscript with that reading is the bilingual Codex Bezae (D/05) from the V century. Hundreds of english Bible versions, and most of them are ONLY making small changes ..INSIGNIFICANT changes which over time become gradually accepted. It was the most commonly used text type for Protestant denominations.. BeDuhn points out that the general public and many Bible scholars assume that the differences in the New World Translation (NW) are due to religious bias on the part of its translators. They cant all be simultaneously true so it is important to seek out the truth. Fact is you choose to suppress it, and by doing so you distance yourself from the Grace of GOD. The case of using the Dead Sea Scrolls to modify the Masoretic text is no different. Jesus was hauled before Pilate for the Jewish religious Elite wanted Him dead, because they charged Jesus with blaspemy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukRCVDmiAts. These are the manuscripts on which Westcott and Hort and the modern versions rely so heavily. Codex Sinaiticus (A) Codex Sinaiticus discovered from the Monastery of Saint Catherine at Sinai 1844. https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102007409#h=22:2-23:524https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/102007409#h=22:2-23:524. re 17. I concur. Stop using your cults limited understanding of morality, spirituality and limited understanding of the universe.as a template for how you should think believe. Theres accountability to the record. If anyone is interested, a good place to start is the work of Dr Cooper. Thanks in advance. You are applying 20th century, literate society ideas on a first century oral transmission society. Not in Gods economy. But if that were so, how could they be so different? Of course, the implications of this, if true, are monumental. The main texts, Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, contradict each other over 3,000 times in the gospels alone, and they disagree with the ' Majority Text' in 13,000 places. Please site such evidence if it exists. Woe to the Textus Receptus supporters. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. How is it that these ancient manuscripts lay forgotten (Siniaticus) or ignored (Vaticanus) for 1500 years or more? safaree net worth 2021 forbes textus receptus vs septuagint. These few differences between ancient codices dont call into question any doctrine of Christianity. The text of Codex Sinaiticus differs in numerous instances from that of the authorized version of the Bible in use during Tischendorfs time. https://www.faraboveall.com/015_Textual/SinVat_Galatians.pdf Did God speak directly to King James I and the various groups of translators assembled by him to produce the KJV for the English-speaking world??? Until the late 1800s, the Textus Receptus, or the "received text," was the foremost Greek text from which the New Testament was derived. almost a millionaireAnd so if my little stash is diminshed little by little who will care? He discovered the first part in 1844 and the second part in 1859. the textual variant Jesus, angry, stretched out his hand and touched him is in the Codex Bezae, not in the Codex Sinaticus. If Satan can place doubt about the word of God in mans head, he has the war half won It is by faith and faith alone we can be saved I have personally been transformed from a drunkard, dope head, and whoremonger, into a son of God by faith and our so called flawed KJV. The English translation was not translated from the Codex, but evidently copy-pasted from some English version of the Bible and mapped onto the verse numbers in the CS. However, in 1881 scholars Westcott and Hort published a new Greek New Testament text that included the findings of Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus. Dating to the mid-fourth century C.E., Codex Sinaiticus is the oldest complete manuscript of the New Testament. The Codex Sinaiticus is serving today as the basis for almost all modern Bible translations since the beginning . The New Testament still stands alone as the best attested ancient document, period. In the end days, knowledge shall increase. -Thus proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus. However, this addition does not appear in the oldest Greek manuscripts. 8 years of Archaeology Odyssey online, exploring the ancient roots of the Western world in a scholarly and entertaining way, The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land. Pilate flatly told the Jewish leaders that he found NO FAULT in this man. (The King James Version and New King James Version are based on the Textus Receptus.) Just like the serpent was doing the devils dirty work in the Garden of Eden where God walked and talked with our first parents, (and conquered for a time), so too the devil has had his agents working to subvert and pervert Scripturelittle by little, line by line, here a little there a little over many centuries. I do have several annotated scriptures myself and they are from several different groups or editors A favorite is the New Jerusalem Bible, if for no other reason, it includes the deutero-canonical books of the OT such as Maccabees and Ecclesiasticus. This is the cause of the surprise of the British Library staff, who are acknowledged world class experts in handling such manuscripts. For those who wish to expand their knowledge of Bible versions and what is missing, and more importantly why, I suggest you watch the attached Walter Veith videos on youtube as a starting point. It appears in the Greek Codex Alexandrinus of the fifth century, the Latin Vulgate, and elsewhere. Hopefully their path will lead to righteousness worthy of Almighty Gods approval. My question about, neither the son is there Most of the epistles are written before the gospels. But it would be fair for an annotated version of the Bible to include reference to Following is the story of how Tischendorf found the Codex Sinaiticus: And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. I dont this boils down to Mark in KJV vs. Sinaiticus by any means.There are more books and there are more versions of Mark. WHAT IS HIS SONS NAME? Your email address will not be published. The All-Access membership pass is the way to get to know the Bible through biblical archaeology. Hardly. Both the Codex and the KJV Greek manuscripts show the diety of Yeshua in different ways! I believe that by the power of the Holy Spirit the mysteries will be revealed to those who seek truth. See the works of Dr.Ivan Panin on internet concerning this and other issues.. BAS seems to use the Codex when it suits the notion that Yeshua was not the Son of God. The Codex Sinaiticus appears to have the reading (as opposed to of the Textus Receptus) with some marks above it. Scripture testifies to that truth time and again. That is the question you must ask and answer for yourself honestly and carefully. He claims that the gospels were written after the deaths of Peter and Paul. The woman caught in adultery from John 8 is omitted in Codex Sinaiticus. -Thus proving anything Godly about Christianity is bogus. Go read the 18th chapter. The KJV is actually a revision of an earlier translation; The Bishops Bible published in 1568. In it we are given this assurance: The green grass dries up, the blossom withers, but the word of our God endures forever. (Isaiah 40:8; 1 Peter 1:25) The version known as the Peshitta plays a humble but important role in the accurate transmission of the Bibles message to all of humanity Clearly that must have been because they were recognised from a very early date to be unreliable to the point of theological fraud. BTW, the Pericope de Adultera (John 8:1 ff) was preserved in the Western canon for a thousand years before it was introduced to the Greek and Syriac canons. Textus Receptus Definition The King James Version of the Bible, the best-selling Bible of all time, was translated using the Textus Receptus. However, he states: Most of the differences are due to the greater accuracy of the NW as a literal, conservative translation. While BeDuhn disagrees with certain renderings of the New World Translation, he says that this version emerges as the most accurate of the translations compared. He calls it a remarkably good translation. Also, Luke 9:55-56 are not completely absent in Codex Sinaiticus. The hurricane of Islamic conquest across the Middle East from the 7th century on was, of course, another major factor in destruction. The King James and Tischendorf? Here is your ticket to join us as we discover more and more about the biblical world and its people. Strange where you find some of BC assertions of the immortality of the soul. Everyones complaining yet the letter, sent from Juda to his apostles, in jerusalem warning of people corrupting the words of jesus clearly names jesus as a servant of god rather than the son of god if they were gods first companions why didnt they state so i mean jesus should have told them at from the beginning quite EXPLICITLY! I didnt want to put it with other translations on my bookshelves lest someone read it unawares and was led astray, but I did not feel comfortable destroying it so I hid it. Did James Tabor help write it? It has commonly been argued, for at least 200 years (John Bengel, d. 1752, was the first), that no matter what Greek text one may use it will not affect any doctrine. If I have 999, 999 dollar coins, one may conclude that I am a millionaire, even I might. Textus Receptus is Latin for "Received Text." It was used as the textual base for the vernacular translations that arose during the Reformation period. I will always prefer the KJV with all its faults. Be Blessed, Chuck. Burgon, a supporter of the Textus Receptus, suggested that Codex Sinaiticus, as well as codices Vaticanus and Codex Bezae, were the most corrupt documents extant. Steve, you have the DNA of GOD in you. Some modern versions of the New Testament, based primarily on the Alexandrian Text, have drawn many readings into question even though the readings are affirmed in ancient patristic compositions and are supported by the overwhelming majority of manuscripts. For example, the resurrection narrative at the end of Mark (16:920) is absent from the Codex Sinaiticus. It is now generally believed that both the Curetonian and Sinaitic manuscripts are extant copies of the old Syriac Gospels dating from the late second or early third century. Here is Matthew 16:14. (HINT: The Catholics would burn one at the stake for even possessing a Bible copy back in the day). And no, Steve, the are thousands and thousands positives and no negatives at all. As a whole picture this breadth of 5,800 manuscripts agree with the gospel account. Let me point out that the oldest Bible on display in the United States is the Codex If we speak of provenance in an art museum, we know where the picture has been since it was painted by the artist. Are you afraid readers will get a conclusion contrary to your publishing bias? Space does not allow me point out the mutilation of Codex Vaticanus (B). And why do we humans who take such pride in our organizational and community identities save in one kind of organization or community seem to save their harshest rebukes for each other for that matter, in this case Protestants against Catholics and vice versa? Clearly, as promised, Jehovah God has preserved his Holy Word. And then when I read a modern version of the Bible (derived from the Westcott and Hort revisions) I never experience this power or anything like it at all??? As for the resurrection in Mark or not in Mark versus Sinaiticus..I think there are endless debates over the Long Ending and the Short Ending of Mark, with scholars evenly divided in their views. And how about the epistle of Barnabas and the Shepherd of Hermas? And why would God hide the truth from his people for almost 2000 years before giving them the correct script of His Holy Word in the form of Codex Sinaiticus? On actually checking the Greek text, however, I found that what was numbered 13 in the CS was the verse we know as 14. The Textus Receptus is the text which the King James translators used. We simply dont know what to believe anymore!. Amen ! Many of the larger monasteries had a scriptorium in which the production of new manuscripts was constant. Denominationalism must be blamed on our own selfish ambitions and vain conceit as Paul describes in Philippians 2.3, when we ignore Scripture as many Christians often do. How else could it be that no copies of these manuscripts, not even on small fragments, have been discovered? Silly, utter nonsense spawned by Satans minions. think ian mportant thought, before general literacy the spoken word was all one had and the idea of quoting a past remark was not part of the culture. Rome couldnt get rid of all the Bibles which were being mass produced by the protestors the heretics as Rome branded them, so after a time they got busy by subversion and decided it would suit their purpose better if they worked to alter the Text of the Bible from within. What have you got to lose? But do it with a sincerely open mind. If these two represent an older and more original text, how come they differ from each other so much? Have a look at Proverbs 30:4 Two men who did not believe the scriptures were inerrant, who conducted seances, who did not believe in the miracles of Christ and who were enamored of Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution. One night some sheepherders were sitting around the campfire.. just cant hold a candle to And there were shepherds abiding in the fields, keeping watch over their flocks by night.. . Then that history was erased, and replaced with the gosple account agreeable to the era? After all this education I have decided to always demand the KJV Only. I really enjoyed the side-by-side comparison; its clear that scribes through time have substantially modified the text. A court is not the appropriate place to prove or disprove the authenticity of old manuscripts. They are both written on parchment, and have a large number of corrections written over the original text. And now there are Christians in every country on earth just as Jesus commanded his disciples to do. The Sinaiticus and Vaticanus uncials with many other most important Bible manuscripts - Hebrew, Greek, Coptic and Syriac - came from Alexandria." (The International Standard Biblical Encylopedia) Clearly the Alexandrinus Codex is from Egypt. Does this brief article represent the quality of work that is typical of the BAR staff? Further plausible (as a Greek translator of NT into a Somali dialect told me), Imagine the arrogance of Tischendorff. i say that all things will be made clear when Jesus comes back pretty soon. Required fields are marked *. There are 5,309 surviving Greek manuscripts that contain all or part of the New Testament. The old proverbial Trojan Horse trick worked very well back in the old days.
Kankakee Daily Journal Homes For Rent,
Kingdom Come: Deliverance Before Leaving Skalitz,
Tali Sauce Substitute,
Nick Begich Jr,
Melissa Crane Judge Record,
Articles T
